Activity Attendance and consistency of daily activity recording |
Attendance <50%, activities not recorded | Attendance 50–79%, activities inconsistent | Attendance ≥80%, ≥1 activity/day on most days | Attendance ≥90%, complete and consistent daily activities |
Community health (UKM) Share and regularity of community health efforts (promotive-preventive) compared with individual care (UKP) |
Almost all activities are individual (clinical) care, no UKM | UKM <50%, irregular (≤1x/week), few types | UKM 50–69%, fairly regular (≥1x/week), ≥2 types of activity | UKM ≥70%, regular (≥2x/week), varied (≥3 types of UKM activity) |
UKM programme Existence and quality of the UKM programme designed by the village doctor |
No programme | A programme exists but is not running / not relevant / not based on the SPM | Programme running, fairly relevant, based on 1–2 SPM | Active programme, based on village problems, innovative, and based on ≥3 SPM |
Collaboration Collaboration with the Puskesmas, village officials, community health volunteers, or other stakeholders |
No collaboration | 1 collaborative activity | ≥2 collaborative activities | Active and sustained collaboration |
Impact Activities reach their targets, are repeated, and show change or improved access to services |
No impactful activities / no clear targets | Activities exist but reach <10 people/week and are not repeated | Reaches ≥10 people/week or activities are repeated (≥2x) | Reaches ≥20 people/week with signs of change (e.g. more visits, participation, or behaviour change) |
Professionalism The village doctor's work attitude, communication, and initiative |
Passive, shows no role | Limited response, no initiative yet | Good communication, beginning to take initiative | Proactive, leads activities and can solve problems |
Information system Completeness and tidiness of the village doctor's information system/dashboard entries |
Does not fill in the information system | <50% filled in | ≥80% filled in | Complete, routine, tidy |