M&E summary
Open without an accountTwo M&E streams are running: supervising lecturers' monitoring and evaluation of village doctors on seven dimensions scored 1–4, and an evaluation of the transformative curriculum's implementation by respondents across roles.
JEJAK today
190responses
Curriculum evaluation responses
Supervising lecturers' M&E summary according to the programme report
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Monitoring and evaluation sessions | 26 sessions, April–August 2026 |
| Villages monitored | 12 of 62 active villages (19%) |
| Village doctors monitored | 13 of 49 actively reporting doctors (27%) |
| Supervising lecturers involved | 8 lecturers |
| Sessions with written recommendations and follow-up | 19 of 26 (73%) |
| Distribution of result categories | Very good 12 · Good 6 · Adequate 5 · Needs intensive coaching 3 |
| Doctors with two or more sessions | 8 doctors — 4 improved, 3 stable, 1 declined |
| Mean overall score (1–4 scale) | 3.18 |
Evidence
- Public summary Curriculum evaluation summary (M&E) A JEJAK trace page, open without an account and with no data about individuals.
- Kept separately Summary of supervising lecturers' monitoring and evaluation of village doctors (April–August 2026) A supporting document from the programme document archive (Appendix C of the programme report), not yet published here.
Village doctor M&E coverage is only 19–27 percent of active villages and doctors — openly acknowledged as a limitation.